02 December 2008

Statement by fourteen Vice-Chancellors of Australia's non-aligned universities before the Bradley Report

Statement by fourteen Vice-Chancellors of Australia's non-aligned universities before the Bradley Report
24 November

Fourteen Vice-Chancellors have issued the following statement in advance of the report of the Australian Government's Review of Higher Education (Bradley Report) due in December 2008. This includes Professor Elizabeth Harman, Vice-Chancellor, Victoria University.
As the Vice-Chancellors of fourteen non-aligned Australian universities, we keenly anticipate both the upcoming report of the Bradley Review of Higher Education and the government's response.

The Bradley report and its recommendations will require testing through analysis, elucidation and critique. We look forward to a future government plan for the tertiary education sector that is equitable, visionary and sustainable.

As the leaders of universities comprising a critical mass of Australia's Higher Education sector, we stress that it will be imperative in the post-Bradley period that the policy debate about universities be set in the interests of the sector as a whole, not any of its particular components.
A future Higher Education policy that does not deal adequately with all universities will be one that disadvantages a significant number of students, Australian and international, future teachers and health professionals, Australia's underprivileged, rural and metropolitan regions and Indigenous people.

The Tests for the Bradley Review report and the government's response
Our universities are crucial to Australia's Higher Education system and to the workability and equity of any future policy prescription applied to that system. We will assess the Bradley report and the government's response against the three fundamental imperatives of:

  • social inclusion;
  • education and training for a skilled and professional workforce;
  • support for research with impact.

Social Inclusion
Australia's non-aligned universities have long been institutionally committed to providing more opportunities to those who are doing least well, whether these are students facing social or economical disadvantage, regional and rural students, Indigenous students, older Australians seeking essential skills and learning, or students with a disability.


The same principle underlies the Commonwealth Government's most basic educational policies.

Our universities will look to the Bradley report and the government's response for:

a. major improvement in the support of students, such as extensions of living and accommodation scholarships and greater student income support;
b. systemic change ensuring that funding for teaching and learning takes account of the likely learning support needs of the students educated by each university to support equitable outcomes for students from different backgrounds; and
c. avoidance of proposals that have the practical effect of reducing access to or funding of higher education for the disadvantaged and marginalised.

Education and training for a skilled and professional workforce
Universities are Australia's major sources of skilled, flexible, creative labour. Our universities are the Universities of Work: they have a particular capacity to produce an immense variety of work-ready, internationally recognised graduates. Our graduates are trained to meet both their own expectations of employment and their employers' expectations of quality across all regions of Australia.

Our universities will look to the Bradley report and government response for concrete means to:
d. strengthen the contribution of industry and employers to universities; ande. support those universities with an institutional emphasis upon ensuring the fitness of graduates for employment and life-long adaptability as working professionals.

Research with impact
Research is fundamental to all universities, but types of research do and should vary, from the pure or abstract to the applied and engaged. Our universities' research is heavily weighted to research for deployment in partnership with industry, government and communities. It works towards social, technological, health and other practical outcomes, with significant regional, national and international impact, in fields such as health and well-being, technology, education and social inquiry.

Hence, we believe research should be funded on the basis of its quality, with strong support for research with demonstrated meaningful application.
f. Our universities will look to the Bradley report and government response for concrete means to support strong research funding for research that engages with current industry and community need.

Why non-aligned universities matter
The non-aligned universities comprise a real and varied collectivity of students, staff and associated communities. These universities in 2007:

  • Enrolled 376,017 students, representing 38% of the national total, more students than any of the formal interest groups;
  • Enrolled 38%of all international students;
  • Earned $4.8 billion, being 28% of Australian university revenue;
  • Taught 51% of teacher education students and 53% of nursing students;
  • Taught 46% of lower SES students;
  • Taught 57% of regional students and 45% of remote students;
  • Taught 43% of indigenous students; and
  • Taught 39% of students with a disability.
Conclusion
The Bradley Review of Higher Education is vital to Australia's future. As fourteen Vice-Chancellors from the non-aligned universities which make up a significant part of Australian Higher Education, we look forward to its constructive recommendations to ensure our institutions can continue to meet the needs of all Australians and our international students.

Note on Data:
The data cited refer to all universities which are not members of the Australian Technology Network, the Group of Eight, or the Innovative Research Universities Australia.
The data are drawn from:Finance 2007: Selected Higher Education Statistics, DEEWR 2008, http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/profiles/Finance_2007_stats.htm
Students 2007 [full year]: selected higher education statistics, DEEWR 2008 http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/profiles/Students_2007_full_year_.htm

The fourteen Vice-Chancellors and universities are:
Professor Greg Craven, Vice-Chancellor, Australian Catholic UniversityProfessor David Battersby, Vice-Chancellor, University of BallaratProfessor John Finlay-Jones, Acting Vice-Chancellor, Edith Cowan UniversityProfessor Helen Garnett , Vice-Chancellor, Charles Darwin UniversityProfessor Liz Harman, Vice-Chancellor, Victoria UniversityProfessor Bill Lovegrove, Vice-Chancellor, University of Southern QueenslandProfessor Bill MacGillivray, Acting Vice-Chancellor, Southern Cross UniversityProfessor Sally Walker, Vice-Chancellor, Deakin UniversityProfessor Stephen Parker, Vice-Chancellor, University of CanberraProfessor Alan Pettigrew, Vice-Chancellor, The University of New EnglandProfessor Jan Reid, Vice-Chancellor, University of Western SydneyProfessor John Rickard, Vice-Chancellor, Central Queensland UniversityProfessor Paul Thomas, Vice-Chancellor, University of the Sunshine CoastProfessor Ian Young, Vice-Chancellor, Swinburne University of Technology
Professor Elizabeth Harman, Vice Chancellor, Victoria University will be available for comment in relation to this statement, from Thursday 27 November 2008

Media Contacts:
Ms Christine White, Media Manager,Marketing & Communications Department, Victoria UniversityPh: (03) 9919 4322; mobile: 0434 602 884
Andy Gash, Snr. Media OfficerMarketing and Communications Department, Victoria UniversityPh: (03) 9919 4950; mobile: 0411 255 900

1 comment:

smithsan said...

A future Higher Education policy that does not deal adequately with all universities will be one that disadvantages a significant number of students, Australian and international, future teachers and health professionals, Australia's underprivileged, rural and metropolitan regions and Indigenous people.
--------
smithsan
seo